Female Trump Supporter Left Gun Panel Speechless After She Was Told She Doesn’t Need AR-15 for Home Defense (VIDEO)

On Thursday, CNN hosted a panel of Trump voters, made up of people who are pro-guns and people who opposed gun control. The debate quickly turned contentious after Scott Pappalardo, a gun owner who destroyed his AR-15 rifle after the Parkland school shooting, told a female gun owner she didn’t need an AR-15 for home protection.

“The AR-15 should not be used as a home protection weapon,” Pappalardo said.

That led Carrie Lightfoot, a pro-gun Trump voter, to ask, “Why?”

“Because,” Pappalardo began.

“Do you know what a fabulous gun that is for women?” Lightfoot pressed.

“It’s a fabulous gun. So is a shotgun,” he said.

She responded by saying that a shotgun is “much harder to handle.”

Lightfood also took up an impassioned defense of the Second Amendment.

“This is a constitutionally protected right–this is not a government legislated privilege, such as driving a car.”

CNN host Alisyn Camerota then asked her if she thought “the forefathers meant the AR-15” when they wrote the Bill of Rights.

“I think they meant our protection against a tyrannical government and for our self protection,” she said. “Of course they don’t know what the guns are. But–you can’t start messing with our constitutionally protected rights.”

I wonder, did our founding fathers know what the Internet, television or radio were when they protected free speech?

The anti argument is based on emotion or feeling. The pro argument is reasoned and principled.
A home defense weapon should be whatever the person is most experienced with and most comfortable using. Just like everything else in life, it’s up to each individual to decide.

We do not have politicians sitting behind a desk telling us what brand of car to buy, or what brand of cereal to eat, or what store to shop at for shoes.

Why do we need them to tell us what type of weapon we should use to defend our families?

Do you agree?

Share this article, and comment what’s your preferred method of home defense?

Natalie D.

Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider, Conservative US, and Right Journalism! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to "stir up the pot," and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do," drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a "constitutional conservative".

2 thoughts on “Female Trump Supporter Left Gun Panel Speechless After She Was Told She Doesn’t Need AR-15 for Home Defense (VIDEO)

  • March 2, 2018 at 1:24 am
    Permalink

    Did our fore-fathers foresee you being able to spew hatred and murder and rape to every single house when it comes to free speech? No I don’t think so either. Did our fore-fathers think that a woman would ban the prayer, saluting the flag and taking God out of our schools? I don’t think so. Did our fore-fathers look ahead and see the changes that would be made in the type of guns being made-when it came to the 2nd amendment? I don’t think so. One is no different than the other.

    Reply
  • March 2, 2018 at 7:04 am
    Permalink

    Our for fathers wrote a Constitution that was ment for then as well as now the right to bare arms shall not be infringed it doesn’t matter if it’s a shotgun a pistol a high powered rifle or an AR 15 or even a Flintlock black powder rifle single shot it is a God given right to defend oneself our Forefathers knew they would not spell out what types of guns you could bare the British had a more superior rifle than did the Patriots who fought in the Revolutionary war . So don’t give me this shit well you can’t have this or that in defense of your home against criminal elements or the rotten Tyrannical liberal government. The lady with the liberal fake book of statistics has her head well hidden and it ain’t in the sand . ADOLF HITLER was a big advocate of gun control he didn’t just shoot up one school he is responsible for the deaths of over 50 million people and that doesn’t include the whole world he helped other dictators kill just as many , now go ahead You pieces of shit fools who support such a stupid notion that more gun control will stop the violence it won’t it will just escalate no one will be safe except those who were smart enough to keep their guns like me because when you take away the SECOND AMENDMENT ALL THE OTHER RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY OUR FOTEFSTHERS BECOME NULL AND VOID AMERICA WAKE UP SMELL WHATS RIGHT DONT BE FOOLED BY LIBERAL DOGSHIT

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *