Jacksonville Shooting Happened In A Gun-Free Mall….Yet, Liberals Still Demand More Gun Control

Gun-Free Zones are in fact the most dangerous places. It has been proven again and again.

On Sunday, multiple people were shot, when gunfire erupted at a Madden 19 tournament in Jacksonville, Florida. Almost every mass shooting in recent memory had one key feature in common: It happens in a so-called “gun-free” zone. “Gun-Free Zone” signs might as well read “Easy Murders Zone”.

And this is exactly where the Jacksonville shooting occurred.

The mall where Jacksonville shooting occurred is a gun-free zone.

Breitbart reported that the Jacksonville Landing’s “Rules of Conduct” clearly prohibit the possession of firearms, including firearms by those who have gone through the legal process to obtain a concealed carry permit in order to carry a firearm for self-defense.


The rules say, “Possession of a weapon, even if legally carried (except by law enforcement officers) is absolutely prohibited on Landing property.”

Another shooting in another “gun free zone” and yet the redundant blithering idiocy from the left is more gun control! They are too ignorant to follow their own train of thought to its’ logical destination.
They demand gun control because their goal is to leave you helpless, hopeless and totally dependent on them.

Too bad the politicians in Florida continue to proudly display the “gun free” zone signs, which is nothing but an invitation to a mass shooter. They might be better off investing in some, ‘everybody in this building is armed” signs.

That might save some lives.

What do you think? Scroll down to leave a comment below!

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you

Natalie D.

Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider and Conservative US, ! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to "stir up the pot," and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do," drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a "constitutional conservative".

Send this to a friend