The game is ON!
Laura Ingraham has now challenged Cleveland Cavaliers star LeBron James to come on her show, and debate the mixing of sports and politics.
The invite comes after critics slammed Ingraham for telling the NBA star to “shut up and dribble,” instead of talking about politics. LeBron James himself took it on Twitter and wrote: “#wewillnotshutupanddribble”
Ingraham tweeted out the invitation after taking the slings and arrows of a list of entertainers and sports figures for her criticism of the player:
Hey King, Come play on my Court next week. You’re invited on the show anytime. https://t.co/CpXRl5jGzQ
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) February 17, 2018
The NBA player has not yet responded to Ingraham’s invitation.
Laura Ingraham sparked the controversy after she slammed NBA player LeBron James over his critical comments made about President Donald Trump on the Thursday night edition of her Fox News show. Ingraham urged Trump-bashing James to “keep the political commentary to yourself.”
This is what happens when you attempt to leave high school a year early to join the NBA,” she said, lamenting that people “take these ignorant comments seriously.” She concluded: “LeBron and Kevin, you’re great players, but no one voted for you. … So keep the political commentary to yourself — or as someone once said, ‘Shut up and dribble.’”
LeBron will not appear for a debate with Laura Ingraham. Just like Jimmy Kimmel will not appear to debate Ben Shapiro. Because ignorance and ideology cannot debate logic and common sense.
But if by any chance he appears that would be fun to watch. It will be painfully embarrassing for him because he would get intellectually body slammed by Laura in a debate.
She WILL tear him apart!
What do you think? Is LeBron James man enough to debate Laura Ingraham?
Scroll down to leave a comment below!
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider, Conservative US, and Right Journalism! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.