Lawsuit Just Exposed Hillary And The Entire DNC – Largest Campaign Finance Scandal in U.S. History

By now we have figured it out that Hillary Clinton didn’t have any interest in building and protecting Americans. Her only loss was money, and never the well-being of the American people! Now, one thing after another is released about Clinton’s corruption. The amount of corruption coming to light is absolutely overwhelming.

On April 16, the Committee to Defend the President filed suit against the FEC for failing to take action on a report submitted last December. The report lays out evidence of Clinton laundering money through state offices in order to avoid federal campaign laws regarding donation limits. In addition, this was all taking place whilst she reportedly was in control of the DNC and its finances.

The court filing asserts that “Public statements from the DNC’s former chairwoman Donna Brazile reveal that the DNC transferred the HVF (Hillary Victory Fund) funds it received through the state parties to HFA (Hillary for America). She further disclosed that the Clinton campaign also directly controlled the DNC’s funds.”

Via Investors: The Committee to Defend the President has filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton’s campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic state parties and Democratic mega-donors.

As Fox News reported, we documented the Democratic establishment “us[ing] state chapters as straw men to circumvent campaign donation limits and launder(ing) the money back to her campaign.” The 101-page complaint focused on the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) — the $500 million joint fundraising committee between the Clinton campaign, DNC, and dozens of state parties — which did exactly that the Supreme Court declared would still be illegal.


HVF solicited six-figure donations from major donors, including Calvin Klein and “Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlane, and routed them through state parties en route to the Clinton campaign. Roughly $84 million may have been laundered in what might be the single largest campaign finance scandal in U.S. history.

“Here’s what you can’t do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway. As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v. FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept contributions to circumvent base limits, through “earmarks” and “straw men” that are ultimately excessive — there are five separate prohibitions here.

On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list. […]

HVF bundled these megagifts and, on a single day, reported transferring money to all participating state parties, some of which would then show up on FEC reports filed by the DNC as transferring the exact same dollar amount on the exact same day to the DNC. Yet not all the state parties reported either receiving or transferring those sums.”

Pretty much, the evidence is showing that Hillary Clinton and the entire Democratic National Committees created the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) so they could accept large donations exceeding $400,000. If that isn’t a scam then who knows what it is. This is exactly how these people keep in power. Trump was Clinton’s kryptonite!

FEC records show several large contributions reported as received by the HVF and the same amount on the same day (or occasionally the following day) recorded as received by the DNC from a state Democratic committee, but without the state Democratic committee ever reporting the contribution.

For more than a year, FEC records show some 30 separate occasions when the HVF transferred contributions totaling more than $10 million to the DNC without any corresponding record of the receipt or disbursement from the state parties. They illegally jumped right over the state Democratic parties.

According to Politico, “[w]hile state party officials were made aware that Clinton’s campaign would control the movement of the funds between participating committees, one operative who has relationships with multiple state parties said that some of their officials have complained that they weren’t notified of the transfers into and out of their accounts until after the fact.”

It seems that the Clinton campaign was in total control of the transfer of funds and used the party as a “fundraising clearinghouse.”

Former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile acknowledged that “[a]s Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.”

The Supreme Court made evident in the 2014 case, McCutcheon v. FEC, that this exact scenario would violate the law.

Even with this wave of evidence concerning campaign-finance criminality—more than $84 million—the media instead chose on Friday to chase the story of Trump’s $130,000 payment through Cohen to Stormy Daniels. –RedBlueDivided

A lot of people have asked when is Hillary Clinton going to fade out of the spotlight. Some complain they’re tired of hearing about her, others that she’s getting too much publicity. I think we’re very happy to keep her in the spotlight because there are so many things that need to come to light. The Clinton’s have been in power for over 40 years, and maybe even longer than that. Everything the Clinton have done needs to be brought out into the spotlight, and they need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Life in prison with no parole. Possibly even the d***h penalty. Liberals constantly defend this vile woman, yet when you go over to Haiti, just ask them how much love the Clinton’s, and all the work they’ve done for them. You will be met with great sadness, and anger. They did nothing but rip those poor people off through the Clinton Foundation.

Today Breitbart reported that Dan Backer, a Virginia-based attorney, filed a lawsuit claiming that the parties planned to bypass federal campaign contribution limits.

“You had individuals giving $300,000,” Backer told the Las Vegas Review-Journal Friday. “They’re not doing it because they care about Nevada’s or Arkansas’ state party. They’re doing it to curry favor with and buy influence with Hillary Clinton.”

Backer said he filed his latest lawsuit because the FEC failed to act before the deadline.

The campaign finance attorney said records show the Hillary Victory Fund transferred $1.7 million to the Nevada Democratic Party from December 2015 to November 2016. But the state party claimed it received only $146,200 and transferred the money to the DNC.

He added that the Hillary Victory Fund sent the other $1.6 million to the Nevada Democratic Party, but the DNC received the money and it never showed up on the state party’s campaign finance reports.

Other state parties reportedly took part in the scheme as well.

The Idaho Statesman reported that Idaho Democratic Party allegedly chipped in $1.6 million to the scheme in 13 installments, although party officials might not have been aware of how their money had been handled.

In Delaware, state Democrats received $2.4 million from the Hillary Victory Fund over 11 installments before transferring nearly the same amount to the DNC, WXDE reported.

Several spokespersons for the state Democratic parties refuted these claims as nothing more than “a political stunt.”

“This is nothing more than a bogus political stunt feebly designed to distract from vulnerable Republicans’ disastrous agenda,” Helen Kalla, a spokeswoman for the Nevada Democratic Party, told the Review-Journal.

“Let’s be clear, this is nothing more than a Beltway political stunt led by the pro-Trump PAC ‘The Committee to Defend the President,’ one that’s simply designed to distract Delaware voters,” Jesse Chadderdon, the Delaware Democratic Party’s executive director, told WXDE.

Donna Brazile, former interim chair of the DNC, noted that Clinton campaign had influenced the DNC long before Hillary Clinton won the primary against Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

Brazile revealed in November that former DNC chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) agreed to let the Clinton campaign control party operations. She added that the campaign, in turn, agreed to help the DNC with fundraising to get the party out of debt.

The words Scheming and Clinton are synonymous. Whenever there’s scheming or any other crime, you can bet a Clinton is involved. $84M is chump change for Crooked Hillary.

Just ask the Haitian’s.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you

Editor’s Note: This particular story was popular at the time it originally made the news and is circulating again a second time for the important and applicable message that’s relevant today.

Alex Hall

Alex D is a conservative journalist, who covers all issues of importance for conservatives. He writes for Conservative US, Red State Nation, Defiant America, and Supreme Insider. He brings attention and insight from what happens in the White House to the streets of American towns, because it all has an impact on our future, and the country left for our children. Exposing the truth is his ultimate goal, mixed with wit where it's appropriate, and feels that journalism shouldn't be censored. Join him & let's spread the good word!

Send this to a friend