At the end of the day… it all boils down to Obama.
It was reported that Obama CIA Chief John Brennan, made a secret visit to Moscow around the same time as fusion GPS produced anti-Trump memos. Brennan’s a visit to Moscow happened in March 2016, just weeks before Christopher Steele produced his first anti-Trump memo.
The Moscow Times reported: “John Brennan, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), made a secret visit to Moscow in March, according to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Oleg Syromolotov. The visit, he said, had nothing to do with Russia’s decision two weeks ago to begin withdrawing from Syria.
“It’s no secret that Brennan was here,” Syromolotov was quoted by the Interfax news agency as saying Monday. “But he didn’t visit the Foreign Ministry. I know for sure that he met with the Federal Security Service (the successor agency to the Soviet KGB), and someone else.”
It wasn’t clear why Brennan visited Moscow, but the trip appears to have coincided with President Vladimir Putin’s surprise March 14 announcement that Russia’s combat operation in Syria was ending, and Moscow would soon withdraw a portion of its forces from the country after conducting 167 air strikes.”
“Spycraft” at work. Brennan goes to Moscow, gets a made-up dirt story to take Trump out, Russia then stops their combat operation! Now if anything, that sounds to me, not like collusion, but a conspiracy to take down a POTUS. Which is in itself a traitorous operation!
One thing is sure… If Brennan went to Moscow to get this bought and paid for fiction, you can bet that Obama not only knew but ordered that trip.
They were not even trying to be efficient. They thought their contrivances would NEVER see the light of day because they were so accustomed to the MSM covering for them. They thought they were untouchable.
What do you think? Scroll down to leave a comment below!
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider and Conservative US, ! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.