It is quite obvious today’s educational system has got nothing to do with teaching a child how to read write and know Math. Schools are stepping way over the boundaries in what they are teaching and allowing to be taught. This was evident when a Californian school forced kids to have sex education lessons. They also must learn about abortion and homosexuality.
Via LifeSite News: “California is about to implement new abortion- and homosexuality-promoting sex education lessons, and one school district has told parents they have no choice but to expose their children to them,”
“California enacted the California Healthy Youth Act in 2015, but only now are its controversial provisions starting to take effect in classrooms. Under the auspices of health, the law says it will equip students to develop ‘healthy attitudes’ on ‘gender (and) sexual orientation,’ among other things. It also says it will inform students about the ‘effectiveness and safety of all FDA-approved contraceptive methods,’ and facilitate ‘objective discussion’ about “parenting, adoption, and abortion.”
“It defines ‘anal intercourse,’ ‘phone sex,’ and more as ‘common sexual behaviors.’”
Parents have every right to be angry! This is not the school’s responsibility or its right. It’s for the parents to talk to her children about such things. Schools need to stay in there own lanes.
If the people of California don’t stand up and fight against this and protect their children from the government now, it could be more harmful and undermine the next generation and beyond. It will take generations to undo. This kind of stuff is counter productive to life and can throw whole societies in the melting pot of degradation. Sometimes our government is looking like some of these freakish movies that Hollywood has made.
What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider, Conservative US, and Right Journalism! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.