CNN Hits Omar with “Fraud Rampant” Question – Her Loss for Words is Priceless! (Video)
You know that moment when someone gets caught so flat-footed they can’t even string a sentence together? That’s exactly what happened when CNN’s Jake Tapper grilled Rep. Ilhan Omar on why fraud in Minnesota spiraled so wildly out of control. The question was simple: “Why did fraud in Minnesota get so out of control?” Omar’s response? A stuttering, um-filled disaster that exposed her either as clueless or complicit. “I think what happened, um, is that, you know, when you have these, kind of, new programs that are, um, designed to, uh, help people…I just think that a lot of the COVID programs…were set up so quickly that a lot of the guardrails did not get created.”
Video:
But here’s the kicker: Somalis have committed nearly 100% of the major fraud cases in Minnesota over recent years, siphoning hundreds of millions, if not billions, back to Somalia to fund terrorism. Omar’s excuse? Blame the “lack of guardrails” in COVID programs she helped shape. Bill Glahn from the Center of the American Experiment told The Post, “[Rep. Omar] knew who these people were. People she personally knew were making tens of millions of dollars in this program.” Yet she claims ignorance, despite introducing the bill that unleashed $250 million in fraud.
“Some people did something,” indeed. Omar’s loss for words isn’t just priceless—it’s a damning admission that the system’s been rigged from the start, and she’s either too blind or too deep in it to see straight. Voters, demand accountability; midterms are your chance to clean house.
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider and Conservative US, ! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.
