Two days ago, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page who worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and special counsel’s Russia probe, testified behind closed doors, after she initially refused to testify in public.
Page declined to join Strzok who testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform and House Judiciary Committees Thursday.
During his testimony, Strozk defended himself by denying that texts he exchanged with Lisa Page in which they discussed “stopping” Trump from becoming president — were indicative of bias that affected the investigations.
But, on Monday Republican congressman John Ratcliffe alleged that Page contradicted many parts of testimony from her colleague and lover Peter Strzok and even admitted that the texts “mean exactly what they say.”
Ratcliffe said: “There are differences in their testimony on many cases. In many cases, she admits that the text messages mean exactly what they say, as opposed to Agent Strzok, who thinks that we have all misinterpreted his own words on any text message that might be negative.”
Of course, that’s what they mean. Who writes words they don’t mean? Trump was right all along! The FBI under Obama was used as the personal police arm of the democratic party. Peter Strzok can’t even be faithful and loyal to his own wife and family, but he wants us to believe he’s faithful and loyal to the other 330 million Americans! He tried to play Clinton’s game and unfortunately for him it didn’t work.
After this, I wonder… Don’t the Dems feel stupid defending that liar Strzok? He did look the committees in the eyes lied and didn’t even blink. Lied under oath!
I hope some justice will come from this. What do you think?
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider and Conservative US, ! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a “constitutional conservative”.