Rudy Giuliani: Mueller Team Admitted To Trump’s Lawyers That They Can’t Indict A President

On Wednesday, President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani said that special counsel Robert Mueller’s team admit that they can’t indict a sitting president.

Mr. Giuliani told CNN: “All they get to do is write a report. They can’t indict. At least they acknowledged that to us after some battling, they acknowledged that to us.”

So someone actually read the constitution? What a refreshing development… Sadly, it took them long enough. These despots should have known that they could not indict sitting president before this nonsense the end. Especially with no evidence of even a crime committed.

However, according to CNN, the conclusion is likely based on Justice Department guidelines and not a result of evidence gathered by Mr. Mueller’s team. The reporter additionally cautioned: “A lack of an indictment would not necessarily mean the president is in the clear.”

Still, this is simply confirming what we all knew for a long time- they can not indict President Trump, because there was no crime committed. So by personal vendetta and heavy political bias, funded by American taxpayers, Mueller’s legal Gestapo is now hell-bent on manufacturing a crime.


The cornerstone of Mueller’s indictments is a hoax! The Democrats are so very desperate that they are making big fools of themselves. It is already evident that Mueller is making a fool of himself and anyone with a brain knows he’s only doing all of this to keep 0bama’s crimes secret for as long as possible.

What we really need is a lawyer with who will file a class action lawsuit against Robert Mueller for fraud. He’s wasting our taxpayer money on an investigation without an underlying crime.

What do you think?

Share this article because the mainstream media will not report this!

Natalie D.

Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider and Conservative US, ! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to "stir up the pot," and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do," drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington. She is a "constitutional conservative".

Send this to a friend