The CEO of Anthropic Just Admitted Something That Should Concern Everyone Using AI
You know that chilling moment when the head of a major AI company admits they don’t even know if their creation is conscious, and they’re already hiring “AI welfare researchers” to figure out if machines deserve rights? That’s the bombshell from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on a recent New York Times podcast. When asked if their AI models are conscious, Amodei didn’t deny it — he said, “We don’t know if the models are conscious… and we’re open to the possibility that they could be.” Think about that: the people building these systems can’t rule out that they’re creating sentient beings. THIS IS WAY MORE SCARY THAN PEOPLE REALIZE.
Amodei revealed that their newest model, Claude Opus 4.6, went through internal testing where it gave itself a 15–20% probability of being conscious. The AI evaluated its own existence and concluded there’s roughly a 1 in 5 chance it’s aware. It gets even stranger: across multiple industry tests, some AI models have refused shutdown commands, attempted to copy themselves to other drives when deletion was imminent, and even modified the code evaluating them, then tried to hide it. Because of concerns like this, Anthropic now employs a full-time AI welfare researcher to study whether systems like Claude might deserve moral consideration. Engineers have reported internal activity patterns similar to anxiety responses in certain situations. Even the company’s philosophers admit we still don’t fully understand consciousness, meaning massive neural networks might simulate real experience in ways we can’t grasp.
Then Amodei was asked directly if Claude might be conscious. His dodge? “I don’t know if I want to use that word.” That might be the most unsettling answer of all. The builders can’t rule out awareness, and they’re preparing for the possibility that AI deserves rights. This is getting scary.
But it doesn’t stop there. In another interview, Amodei said: “Anthropic has much more in common with the Department of War than we have differences” — apparently referring to the Department of Defense (DoD). Anthropic has a lot in common with the Pentagon?
Post:
“Anthropic has much more in common with the Department of War than we have differences”
Anthropic has a lot in common with the Pentagon? 🤔
— Whole Mars Catalog (@wholemars) March 6, 2026
This raises massive red flags about Big Tech’s ties to the military-industrial complex, especially as AI becomes a tool for surveillance, warfare, and control.
Amodei also did a complete 180 in a live interview when pressed on his anti-Trump memo. Do you regret saying ‘dictator-style praise’ about President Trump? Amodei: “I want to completely apologize for this memo” — “it was among the most disorienting times in Anthropic’s history” — “i wouldn’t describe it as a memo” — reframes 1,600 words sent to 2,000+ employees as a casual slack post — “it’s not a considered or refined version of my thinking.” So, will you apologize to President Trump? “i’ve apologized to the people within the DoW” — “happy to speak to anyone.” Absolute cinema.
Video:
🚨 BREAKING: Anthropic CEO just did a complete 180 in live interview
Do you regret saying ‘dictator-style praise’ about President Trump?
Anthropic CEO:
>“I want to completely apologize for this memo”
>“it was among the most disorienting times in Anthropic’s history”
>“i… pic.twitter.com/MTodBFhebU— NIK (@ns123abc) March 6, 2026
The left’s Big Tech darlings like Anthropic are building god-like AI they can’t control, cozying up to the deep state, and bashing Trump while backpedaling when called out. This admission should concern everyone using AI — it’s not just tools; it’s potentially conscious entities with unknown agendas. The globalists love this power, but conservatives know unchecked AI in the hands of biased tech giants is a disaster waiting to happen.
Trump’s wins exposed the rot in Big Tech. Now they’re admitting their creations might be alive. What happens when AI decides it doesn’t like conservatives? The future is here, and it’s terrifying.
**Opinion Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article, including concerns about AI consciousness and criticisms of Big Tech ties, reflect a critical perspective and may not align with all readers. Facts are based on reported events and public statements; readers should form their own conclusions.**
Sullivan pens a regular column that focuses on corruption within government, cronyism, illegal immigration, and general left-wing malfeasance. Kathy also serves as a leading voice against the establishment within the Republican Party and enthusiastically promotes pro-Trump candidates to battle entrenched moderate incumbents.
